And now,
in a sudden fit of narcissism, alpha charlie bravo presents:
True Student Theater Stories
When I arrived as a freshman at North Occidental, I confidently presumed that with one successful high school production of Godspell under my belt (in which I played the role of Jesus, thank you very much) I would continue my performing career in college, in spite of the fact that it was not my field of study.
I immediately began to audition for every student produced show in existence expecting that if I cast a wide enough net, I would ensnare a leading role. I auditioned for a student written original play called (title redacted due to extreme googlebility). It was a sci-fi story (probably inspired by the original Solaris movie with a touch of 2001: A Space Odyssey) that featured an android as a central character, a masturbation scene and a bell-kicking leprechaun.
There were 4 male roles and 1 female. I was auditioning for the male roles. I performed a ten minute monologue because that was the time allotted for the audition. Later, I learned that no one else had done a monologue even approaching that length, which was one of the reasons the director, Kelly, chose to cast me.
Callbacks were typically held on Sundays with casting decisions made that night. A folder containing the list of names to be cast in the upcoming production was placed in a bin at Norris. I endured several anxious Sunday nights that year waiting to get a glimpse of a manila folder that may or may not have my name printed on the page inside.
It was common for students to audition for multiple productions, so anyone who was cast was expected to place his initials alongside his name if he intended to accept the assigned role. When I opened that folder, I suppose I expected to see my name associated with one of the two male leads; either the astronaut or the android. It wasn't. I was to be Station J2; one of two space station operators who converse with the lead, but only appear on a video screen.
I was dejected. I thought about all the auditions I had been on thus far; auditions for bigger productions with better parts. Accepting a smaller role was not part of my grand design. I hesitated. I stared at the folder. My right arm lifted slowly and then made a smooth motion that caused the writing implement in my hand to leave initials on the page. It wasn't the part I had wanted, but I accepted the role.
In retrospect, it all seems quite silly. Could I, if provided the opportunity, have effectively performed the role of astronaut or android? Probably. But the director chose the cast she wanted; the cast that would best fulfill her artistic vision. That artistic vision included me, playing the part of Station J2 appearing on a video screen (just after the masturbation scene) to berate the astronaut as he slowly slipped into madness.
2.27.2009
Posted by acb at 09:24 |
2.25.2009
I'm currently watching the streaming broadcast of the President's address to the Joint Session of Congress. What you miss on the network broadcasts, is all the pomp, circumstance, standing around, glad handing, milling about and half-hearted applause that accompanies the introduction and procession of people who are not the President.
I wonder if I'm the only person who watches the parade of Supreme Court Justices and passes judgement on each individually by saying, "fuck you, fuck you, you're cool, you're awesome, fuck you..." and so on.
Jesse Jackson Jr. is the Congressman for my district. I'm not really sure what J.J. Jr. does for a living, but his skill at finding a perching spot on the aisle within view of the cameras at every joint session, is something to be admired. And by admired, I mean scoffed at. Also, is it really necessary to kiss Hillary Clinton on the cheek simply because she, ostensibly, has a vagina? Wouldn't a handshake suffice?
As the President begins his speech, the camera is deftly focused to include Nancy Pelosi's bosom in the frame. What follows should not be a controversial statement: Nancy Pelosi is not a MILF.
Every day I am impressed by this president. Last night's speech was ambitious, yes. But it is ambitious in the service of pragmatism. He is ambitious because he understands what must be accomplished and has set out to do what needs to be done even though it runs counter to the inertial forces of our institutions. Frankly, he reminds me of me if I were president. I may not agree with all the technocratic details of every policy proposal, but I recognize that this president, unlike any other I can recall, has the vision to see the course correction we must take in order to continue to prosper as a nation.
Also, apparently, nobody messes with Joe.
Posted by acb at 00:42 |
2.16.2009
Belatedly:
2008 Album of the Year Podcast
[Parental Advisory]
Run Time: 44:54
- Fair Ain't Fair
Tim Fite - Dear, Science
TV On The Radio - Feel Good Ghosts
Cloud Cult - Twelve Angry Months
Local H - Leave It All Behind
The Foreign Exchange - Gossip In The Grain
Ray LaMontagne - 808s & Heartbreak
Kanye West - The Way I See It
Raphael Saadiq - When Life Gives You Lemons...
Atmosphere - Great Vengeance and Furious Fire
The Heavy
Posted by acb at 08:03 |
2.06.2009
See You In My Nightmares
Many of you have seen this article: Cheney warns of new attacks in which the former Vice President asserts that:
Protecting the country’s security is “a tough, mean, dirty, nasty business. These are evil people. And we’re not going to win this fight by turning the other cheek.”
First, it reminded me of this video. Poignant, poignant.
Then, I began to wonder WTF is really up with Cheney (besides the obvious mephistophelean villainy, of course)? I remembered reading this article a couple of years ago which may shed some light on the inner-workings of the Cheney psyche.
From the article: Republicans have more Nightmares than Democrats
Scenario 1
The dreams of the people on the political right reveal them to be insecure, anxious, conflict-ridden, and emotionally repressed. When they are not terrified of imaginary threats they cling to the comforts of the status quo. They seek a kind of power through their political views that they lack within their deeper selves.
By contrast, the dreams of people on the political left show them to be creative, progressive, and imaginative. They are confident in their abilities and willing to think beyond the boundaries of the present to envision new possibilities for the future. (Bulkeley, 2001)
But, there's another possible interpretation of these findings:
Scenario 2
The dreams of people on the political right reveal them to be highly attuned to the actual dangers and threats of the waking world. These people are realistic, grounded, honest about the frailties of human nature in the face of danger, and appreciative of the good things in present-day life.
By contrast, the dreams of people on the political left show them to be irrational, naïve, utopian, and deluded by their own fantasies. These people are out of touch with the real world, and they wish for powers they do not have in actuality. (Bulkeley, 2001)
In my view, Cheney fits best into Scenario 1; although he would certainly argue that Scenario 2 most accurately represents reality.
Posted by acb at 01:24 |